аЯрЁБс>ўџ 79ўџџџ6џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџьЅС#` №ПЁbjbjmЅmЅ . ЯЯЁџџџџџџЄЈЈЈЈЈЈЈМ@@@@T МXnlllllGGGзйййййй$Цh.j§Ј–GG––§ЈЈllлююю–"ЈlЈlзю–зююV‡@ЈЈ'l` ˜.q‰CЪ@И"Ч У(0XгT˜к ˜'˜Ј'œG0w"ю™ЕсGGG§§ф GGGX––––МММ„@МММ@МММЈЈЈЈЈЈџџџџ A committee was appointed by the Interim Dean of CNSM (Professor Paul Layer) to formulate a revised unit criteria for tenure and promotion. Committee members were selected to represent the major academic units of the college: John Olson (Professor/Chair of Physics) Bernard Coakley (Associate Professor of Geology & Geophysics) Richard Boone (Professor/Chair of Biology and Wildlife) Nicole Mіlders (Professor/Chair of Atmospheric Sciences) Tom Clausen (Professor of Chemistry & Biochemistry) Throughout the discussions, the committee members elicited comments from faculty in their departments. Thus, the committee representation allowed for criteria to be established that generally reflect the philosophy of the college. In formulating the criteria, the committee was unanimous in the philosophy to allow unit peer committees large latitude in evaluating promotion/tenure (P/T) files. In particular, the committee eschewed establishing quantitative criteria that would hinder unit peer committees into taking into account the vastly different types of appointments found in the college. Expectations of number of publications, graduate student mentoring, grantsmanship, and other research related activities vary with (joint) appointments and within disciplines and sub-disciplines. Similarly, teaching workloads vary too much to justify a rigid algorithmic evaluation. Factors of student demography, student enrollments, course type (lab-based, writing intensive, etc.), preparation (new course vs. established) are too great to justify one rule fits all criteria. In coming to this conclusion, the committee was guided by criteria of similar institutions in the lower 48 (e.g. University of Montana). The committee chose instead to clarify the criteria and to provide guidance to faculty going up for P/T on how to prepare a strong file. In this manner, the committee made the following modifications: New examples of measures of teaching research and service performance are included throughout the document. A statement of clarification of the standard that must be met when going up for P/T was included (Section III.A.3). Many assistant professors, for instance, have expressed confusion over what standard (assistant professor or associate professor) they must meet for obtaining tenure and this is now explicitly stated. A statement of clarification was made regarding the importance of sole and first authorship papers (Section III.C). This was deemed necessary because the question is often asked by members of the University Wide Committees. We also inserted a statement to the candidate that it is their responsibility to use their narrative to explicitly state their role in joint publications. For files containing funded grants with several PI / Co-PIs, we included instructions to the candidate to clearly state their role in the project (Section III.C). The committee felt that the Unit Peer Committee would benefit greatly from the candidate giving a seminar to their peers and we consequently included a statement of this recommendation in the first paragraph of section III.A. The committee feels that the new criteria provides additional guidance to the candidate for P/T to establish a strong file, clarify issues that are frequently raised by the University Wide Review Committees, and provides numerous examples that can be used as evidence of quality teaching, research and service. While we have attempted to remove ambiguities in the criteria, some level of imprecision must remain to maintain flexibility in dealing with diverse workloads. We unanimously feel that resulting uncertainties will be minor and easily addressed during periodic evaluations by deans, chairs, and unit peer committees. !()*ту№ I J b h i l r € ‚ œ \ ] Є І 7 B _ q t u Ј Ц Ь Э в г џ f Њ Ћ У Щ № —œвщъ;>K]ЖЗ)‹›љњўџЅІр7GHIefjkopѓ§+фќјќјќєќ№ќ№ќ№ј№ј№ј№ј№ј№ј№ј№ј№ј№ј№ј№ј№ј№ьјьјьјьјьјьшфьјьшьфьрмрјрјрьршмшршјшјшјшзЯшмhk/h5O%6 hб-6hоnhфeџhk/h5O%hOo­h~чhњt&hб-hTQRуф J ‚ Л я № и й ДЕы)ІI+,Ё§§эййййддддддРРРРРЛЛgdоn & F Ц@ „Ѕ„Р§^„Ѕ`„Р§gdOo­gd~ч & F Ц@ „5„0§^„5`„0§gd~ч & F Ц@ „%ѕ`„%ѕgdTQЁўфхщъ№ёd Ёќјќјќјє№јh(`hk/hоnh“9@ ,1hАа/ Ар=!А"А# $ %ААаАа а†œD@ёџD NormalCJ_HaJmH nHsH tHDAђџЁD Default Paragraph FontRiѓџГR  Table Normalі4ж l4жaі (kєџС(No List Ё џџџџуф J‚Ля№ийДЕы) І I + , Ѓ˜0€€˜0€€˜ 0€€˜ 0€€˜ 0€€˜ 0€€˜ 0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜0€€˜ 0€€˜ 0€€˜ 0€€˜ 0€€˜ 0€€˜0€€˜0€€фЁ Ё Ё№8№@ёџџџ€€€ї№’№№0№( № №№B №S №ПЫџ ?№џџЛq›.|ؘМq›.ЄGžНq›.СœœЊЃІББЃ9*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags€place€=*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €PlaceName€=*€urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags €PlaceType€ Д€všЃZq7AЃ33ЃЃ*„˜т/џџџџџџџџџ/sS˜т/џџџџџџџџџЇ Ёi‚4Еџџџџџџџџџd„@ „$ѕЦ@ ^„@ `„$ѕOJQJo(‡hˆHЗ№d„ „˜ўЦ ^„ `„˜ўOJQJ^Jo(‡hˆHod„p„˜ўЦp^„p`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЇ№d„@ „˜ўЦ@ ^„@ `„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЗ№d„„˜ўЦ^„`„˜ўOJQJ^Jo(‡hˆHod„р„˜ўЦр^„р`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЇ№d„А„˜ўЦА^„А`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЗ№d„€„˜ўЦ€^„€`„˜ўOJQJ^Jo(‡hˆHod„P„˜ўЦP^„P`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЇ№d„@ „$ѕЦ@ ^„@ `„$ѕOJQJo(‡hˆHЗ№d„ „˜ўЦ ^„ `„˜ўOJQJ^Jo(‡hˆHod„p„˜ўЦp^„p`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЇ№d„@ „˜ўЦ@ ^„@ `„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЗ№d„„˜ўЦ^„`„˜ўOJQJ^Jo(‡hˆHod„р„˜ўЦр^„р`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЇ№d„А„˜ўЦА^„А`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЗ№d„€„˜ўЦ€^„€`„˜ўOJQJ^Jo(‡hˆHod„P„˜ўЦP^„P`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЇ№d„@ „$ѕЦ@ ^„@ `„$ѕOJQJo(‡hˆHЗ№d„ „˜ўЦ ^„ `„˜ўOJQJ^Jo(‡hˆHod„p„˜ўЦp^„p`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЇ№d„@ „˜ўЦ@ ^„@ `„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЗ№d„„˜ўЦ^„`„˜ўOJQJ^Jo(‡hˆHod„р„˜ўЦр^„р`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЇ№d„А„˜ўЦА^„А`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЗ№d„€„˜ўЦ€^„€`„˜ўOJQJ^Jo(‡hˆHod„P„˜ўЦP^„P`„˜ўOJQJo(‡hˆHЇ№/sS*„Ї ЁiџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџМOфц        МOфц        !х k/TQ_X5O%уa%њt&б-Ф3“9@OHW(`˜l#Cmоn2€l)ф3Žн —й?š;Ёє[ЂџЅOo­”HЎœ!Бу ОН}РфEв~ч—ѕ@=ћІ џфeџЕЃ sџ@€|ƒeЁp@џџUnknownџџџџџџџџџџџџG‡z €џTimes New Roman5€Symbol3& ‡z €џArial;†SimSun‹[SO?5 ‡z €џCourier New;€Wingdings"qŒ№аhvкІvкІ.s .s Y4№ ДД24šš2ƒQ№џ§KX)№џ?фџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџTQ2џџ‰A committee was appointed by the acting dean of CNSM (Professor Paul Layer) to formulate a revised unit criteria for tenure and promotion Tom Clausen Hild Peters   ўџр…ŸђљOhЋ‘+'Гй0ќ˜,8P\hx Œ˜ И Ф амфьєфŒA committee was appointed by the acting dean of CNSM (Professor Paul Layer) to formulate a revised unit criteria for tenure and promotion Tom ClausenNormal Hild Peters2Microsoft Office Word@@lR‰CЪ@lR‰CЪ.s ўџеЭеœ.“—+,љЎ0| hpˆ˜  ЈАИР Ш ^ф UAF Chemistryš' ŠA committee was appointed by the acting dean of CNSM (Professor Paul Layer) to formulate a revised unit criteria for tenure and promotion Title ўџџџўџџџ !"#$%ўџџџ'()*+,-ўџџџ/012345ўџџџ§џџџ8ўџџџўџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџRoot Entryџџџџџџџџ РFS3q‰CЪ:€Data џџџџџџџџџџџџ1TableџџџџАWordDocumentџџџџ. SummaryInformation(џџџџџџџџџџџџ&DocumentSummaryInformation8џџџџџџџџ.CompObjџџџџџџџџџџџџqџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџ џџџџ РFMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8є9Вq